Welcome to Dominicans in India    

  Friars
 
Nuns
 
Sisters
 




 

 

Justice and Peace Spirituality in Hindu Tradition

  Fr. Paulson Kannampuzha OP

 

No one can overlook the diversities and distinctions that mark our world. Differences are seen in the lower forms of life as well as in the higher level of human life. Among the human beings the racial, cultural, educational, religious, economic and political differences are so obvious that one tends to forget the underlying unity. But the distinctions are not meant to create disparity among the members belonging to any particular class. In the dynamic struggle for existence, the differences are meant to yield harmony, co-operation and mutual enhancement.

In this paper, I propose to bring in the various aspects in the Hindu tradition which have  served as guiding principles for  the promotion of justice and peace in the Indian society.

 

The Concept of ‘Rita’:

Rig Veda (1200 BCE) the oldest text of Hinduism contains a concept called ‘Rita’ which signifies the concept ‘order and justice’. The Vedic notion of ‘rita’ stands for the physical and moral order of the universe. It also denotes the universal harmony in which all things in the world have a proper place and function. The Vedic gods are said to be guardians  of ‘rita’ (goparitasya xksi_rL;) and practisers of ‘rita’ (ritayuh _rk;q%). The gods are said to follow ‘rita’ in their own lives and they also ensure this eternal law of justice and order is followed in the world[1]. The god Varuna whose eyes are symbolically described as the sun, watches over the human beings and the god is said to reward the doers of good actions and punish those who perpetrate evil deeds.

 

The Notion of ‘Anrita’:

The Rig Veda also contains another word ‘anrita’ which suggests the idea that improper action leads to the disintegration of the universe into unreality or non-being. The implication here is that in the Vedic literature the word ‘rita’ contains ontological significance, i.e. being arises out of proper/ right activity while improper action leads to non-being. This ontological aspect leads to the normative notion that in the ‘Samhita’ literature (the first section of the Vedas) ‘rita’ is the system of activity that guides the world in such a way that the eternal order of the world is not violated. In short, the law of ‘rita’ could be described as the law of truth, righteousness and justice.

 

In line with the concept ‘rita’, the world-view of the Vedic times (1500-900 BCE) was based on an intuitive perception of reality in its totality and inter-dependence. The power that preserves this ontic unity of reality is ‘rita’ (Rig Veda 1:24:8;  10:133:6). Rita is the cause of integration in human person, harmony in society and order in the universe. By attuning oneself with the ‘rita’ of the cosmic totality, one gets liberated from the ambiguities of life. The concept of ‘rita’, thus, points to an integrated attitude to all aspects of life: ‘vyashti’ (the individual), ‘samashti’ (the human society) and ‘srishti’ (the nature). The Vedic optimism is not therefore anthropological but on the whole cosmological. It starts from a more holistic perspective which views humans and cosmos as a dynamic unity in which both are engaged in the very existence of the universe.

 

The Concept of ‘Dharma’:

In the course of time, the concept of ‘rita’ evolved into another concept known as ‘dharma’. The word ‘dharma’ is derived from the Sanskrit root ‘dhri’ which means ‘to sustain’, ‘to support’, ‘to uphold’[2]. ‘Dharma’ has different shades of meaning. ‘Dharma’ meant that principle which upheld or protected the individual and society. Thus it is ‘dharma’ which makes it possible for people to live and function harmoniously in their society by fulfilling themselves and at the same time contributing to the well-being of the society at large. ‘Dharma’ is the essential foundation of this fleeting universe or the basis of things in general and thus signifies truth. ‘Dharmo vishvasya jagatah pratishtha’. It also means one’s duty, responsibility and thereby moral obligation. ‘Dharma’ is that which is right, virtuous, meritorious and accordingly ethical.

‘Dharma’ designates the universal order, the natural law or the uniform norm according to which the whole world runs its course.

‘Dharanadharmamityahuh dharmo dharayate prajah !

Yat syat dharanasamyuktam sa dharma iti nischaya !!    (Mahabharat, Karna Parva 69: 59)

‘Dharma’ is that which upholds all and keeps all living beings together. The chief charactistic of dharma is to bind everything into harmony.

 

‘Loka yatrarthameveha dharmasya niyamah kritah !

Ubhayatra sukhodarkah iha caiva paratra ca’ !!   (Mahabharata, Shanti Parva, Ch. 159)

‘Dharma’ is meant to assist the humankind in its evolution through life. Observance of ‘dharma’ in one’s life results in temporal prosperity and spiritual bliss in the life-after.

According to Hindu Scriptures, establishing ‘dharma’ is a process of liberation. ‘Adharma’ which is the opposite of dharma is the enslavement to our greed and selfishness, to violence and all that is evil. Ignorance, degradation, unhygienic surroundings, non-nutritional food, total lack of skills, social exploitation, cruelty, discrimination and abject poverty are some of the signs of the growth of adharma in society[3]. ‘Dharma’ is a process of liberation from all evil forces in society.

By the end of second century BCE, the term ‘dharma’ came to mean the sum total of one’s obligations by which one ‘fits in’ with the natural and particularly the social world. This is especially pertinent in regard to the duties determined by one’s social class (‘varna’) and the stage of life (‘ashrama’). From this particular period onwards the justice and righteousness in the society was promoted through the observance of ‘varna dharma’ and ‘ashrama dharma’. According to Tantra Vartika, ‘dharma’ consists of doing the duties of one’s own ‘varna’/ caste and the ‘ashrama’/ state of life to which one belongs.

Stratification of the Society

The sage Manu made a study of the society of his time with regard to the division of labour[4]. All the members in the society were engaged in some particular work that suited to their physical and mental capacities. Thus Manu could classify the people into four broad groups which came to be known as four classes: Brahmana, Kshatriya, Vaishya and Sudra. The Brahmins were those who engaged in the intellectual pursuit and thereby preserved and promoted the existing volume of knowledge in the society. Some of them also functioned as priests who ensured the wellbeing of the society by securing the good will of the gods and goddesses through rituals and sacrifices. The second group known as Kshatriyas or the warrior class who secured the law and order in the society. The third group, Vaishyas, attended to the economic needs of the people. They looked after the production and distribution of the material goods for the society. Then came the fourth group of people, the Sudras, who were the unskilled labourers. These provided the much needed manual and other services to the above mentioned three classes by assisting them to carry out their functions efficiently. These groupings were made on the lines of the natural tendencies exhibited by different members of the society. In its original vision, these four classes were to carry out their respective duties so as to make the society a prosperous whole. The distinctions of duties were never meant to discriminate people. All the members in the society get an opportunity to make their contribution to the life of the society according to their physical and psychological dispositions. The common wellbeing of the society was uppermost in the mind of the sage Manu.

 

The four Ashramas

An individual in his/ her life goes through four different stages (ashramas). These are the stages of a student, householder, wanderer (extra domum) and an intense seeker of salvation (Brahmacarya, Grihastha, Vanaprastha and Sanyasa[5] . Each stage of life has its own specific set of duties which an individual is expected to fulfill. A ‘brahmacari’ (student) ought to study diligently in order to acquire and develop the existing volume of knowledge. A ‘grihastha’ (householder) ensures the continuation of generations by establishing a family and nurturing the young ones. He also provides for all the common welfare programmes in the society. It is the ‘grihastha’ who produces wealth in the society through his/her industrious efforts and supports the other three ‘ashramas’. As all the creatures depend on the air for their survival, so, too, the rest three stages/ ‘ashramas’ of life depend on the ‘grihastha’ for their upkeep. The ‘vanaprastha’ (wanderer) is one who entrusts the responsibilities of the household affairs to the grown-up sons and daughters and moves about in the society as he/ she is free of family-responsibilities. He shares his knowledge and wisdom to those householders who approach him for advice on various problems in life. Some may choose to remain at home but do not undertake any domestic responsibility. A ‘sanyasi’ (renunciant) intently seeks his/her personal liberation through a life of meditation and homeless asceticism.  

It is important to note that the various obligations incumbent on members of the different ‘varnas’ and ‘ashramas’ mutually support each other and that an imperfect performance of one’s responsibilities harms the society as a whole. Moral obligations are specific to each ‘varna’ and ‘ashrama’. An individual ought to fulfill them in his/ her life without faltering. Each individual has a unique place in the society; and his/ her role is irreplaceable. So Bhagavad Gita reminds each individual regarding the importance of carrying out one’s own duties in life. “It is better to perform one’s own obligations (swadharma) even poorly than to do another’s duty well.” (Bhagavad Gita 3:35)

‘Sreyan swadharmo vigunah paradharmat swanushthitat

Swadharme nidhanam sreyah pardharmo bhayavahah’.

 

Sadharana Dharma’ or ‘Varnashrama Dharma’:

‘Sadharana dharma’ are those virtues which  are to be cultivated by all despite their class/ caste or stage in life. The practice of these virtues will contribute to the human face of the society. Brihaspati enumerates the following virtues in the list of ‘Sadharana dharma’: Daya (kindness = a feeling of duty to save a friend or foe from troubles), Kshama (patience = fortitude in all kinds of difficulties), Anasuya (the qualities of appreciating others’ virtues and absence of elation at others’ faults), Sauca (purity = avoidance of  vices and strict adherence  to one’s caste duties), Aspriha (contentment with what little one may have and want of jealousy at  others’ prosperity)[6]. Vishnu adds Satya (truthfulness for the good of all), Dama/ mind-control and  Indriya-nigraha/ sense-control to this list.

 

Four Purusharthas:

The Hindu thinkers evolved a scheme of human ends (purusharthas); they are the four goals in one’s life. They are ‘dharma’ (righteousness), ‘artha’ (wealth), ‘kama’ (pleasure) and ‘moksha’ (final liberation/ salvation of soul). All the different aspects of life are integrated in this scheme. ‘Artha and Kama’ (wealth and pleasure) are legitimate needs and desires of human beings. But they are to be acquired only in accordance with ‘Dharma’ or righteousness. To the extent one makes use of unrighteous or immoral ways to acquire wealth and pleasure, one causes discontentment, deprivation and injustice in the society. ‘Moksha’/ salvation is the supreme end of human life. “All the systems of the Indian Philosophical traditions consider ‘moksha’ as the central theme and the ultimate value”[7]. All the values of life like truth, beauty, goodness and morality converge in moksha. Every human action on a person should contribute its share in advancing  his/ her soul to this spiritual goal.

 

Insistence on Duty 

In the Indian Ethics, the watch word is ‘devotion to one’s duties’ rather than assertion of one’s rights. Performance of one’s duty ensures the smooth running of the society and indirectly everyone’s rights are taken care of:

‘Karmanyevadhikaraste ma phaleshu kadachana’   (Bhagavad Gita  2:47).

(= One ought to keep one’s eyes fixed upon one’s own duties and never on the fruits or advantages that might accrue through that action.) Much of the unjust situations in the society are due to dereliction or failure to carry out one’s obligations conscientiously.

 

The Motif of  ‘Avatar’ or Incarnation:

The two great epics of India, Ramayana and Mahabharata, as well as the Puranas explain the story of gods and their ‘avataras’ (incarnations) in the world with a purpose of re-establishing righteousness which was violated by a section of people.

‘Yada yada hi dharmasya glanirbhavati Bharata

Abhyuddhanamaharmasya tadatmanam srijamyaham

Paritranaya sadhunam vinashaya ca dushkritam

Dharma sansthapanarthaya sambhavami yuge yuge.’    (Bhagavad Gita 4:7-8)

Whenever there is a decline of virtue and increase of vice on earth, the Divine Reality manifests itself. For the protection of the good people and for the destruction of the evil-doers and to re-establish virtuous living on earth, the Lord manifests himself.  Mahabharata is the story of Divine intervention (incarnation) of the Supreme Lord Vishnu in the form of King Krishna, so as to protect the aggrieved party of Pandavas and to punish the Kauravas for their injustice and greed for political power.

 

‘Aham Brahmasmi’:

The high point of Upanishadic philosophy (9thc. BCE) can be described in that Vedic formula, ‘Aham Brahmasmi’. The Vedic seers realized that the spiritual principle deep within each individual person is identical with the Ultimate Cause of the universe[8]. The goal of one’s spiritual pursuit would be to experience this truth of identity. This is called ‘moksha’ or final salvation of a soul. The Hindu philosophy seeks to rise above human sufferings both physical and moral in the state of ‘moksha’. The concept ‘moksha’ is that state of release from all sufferings, the consequences resulting from our actions (‘karma phala’) and that which leads a human soul to its ultimate fulfillment. When the human soul realizes its oneness with the Ultimate Reality, then all distinctions of caste, creed, family and lineage would be of no consequence. While on earth a human person is said to be under the cover of existential ignorance (‘paurusha ajnana’). It means we do not have a proper understanding of the reality[9]. So we are led to sinful deeds. (‘Ajnanenavritam jnanam tena muhyanti jantavah’: Bhagavad Gita 5:15). Deeds of oppression, exploitation and cruelty are all due to our ignorance regarding the reality. Removal of this existential ignorance will produce within us a compassionate heart that would respect every other human person.

 

The Common Weal and the Universal Family:

The following mantra from the Rig Veda exhorts people from all walks of life and status to join hands with others so as to realize the dream of common welfare. ‘Om ajyeshthaso akanishthasa ethe sambhratharo vavridhuh saubhanghaya’. (= The elders and the youth, the great and the small, the elite and the lower class are all brothers and sisters; all should move together in the society so as to bring about collective prosperity.)

 

‘Om sahanavavatu sahanau bhunaktu, saha viryam karvavahai!

Tejasvinavadhitamastu, ma vidveshavahai ! Om shantih, shantih, shantih.’  (Taittirya Upanishad, Brahmananda Valli, Anuvak 1)

(= Let God protect all of us; may god make us enjoy life together; let us acquire power and knowledge together; and let us not ever hate each other.)

From the ancient times the following verse was a part of the Hindu moral education. This is known as the exalted ideal of ‘Vasudhaiva kutumbakam’/ Universal family:

‘Ayam nijah paro vethi ganana laghu chetasam

Udara charitanam tu vasudhaiva kutumbakam’.

(= A broadminded person looks upon the whole world as his/ her own family. One who is narrow-minded makes distinctions between what belongs to oneself and that which is others and is unable to find one’s inter-relatedness with all. Let us stand up as one humanity, one universal family.) When we realize that all the peoples of the earth belong to the same family, then the artificial boundaries that divide human beings would begin to fade away. The economic, racial, intellectual and gender differences which segregate peoples would be treated as merely insignificant.

 

The Vedic seers of India considered themselves the sons of the mother-earth and thought of this planet, earth, as the mother of all those creatures that flourish upon the earth. ‘Mata bhumih putroham prithivyah’(Atharva Veda 12:1:12). A logical conclusion to this belief would be that one is to treat others as sisters and brothers.

 

Gradation of Consciousness

The whole world of beings is nothing but a gradation of consciousness. Human beings have greater degree of consciousness compared to animals and birds. The consciousness in the plant life is said to be dormant. It is believed that the objects like stones there is the possibility of consciousness; but the consciousness is said to be unmanifested.

a)      ‘Purna Chetana’: developed consciousness as in human beings.

b)      ‘Chetana’: not so fully developed consciousness as in beings like animals and birds.

c)      ‘Sushupta Chetana’: consciousness which is said to be dormant as in plants and trees.

d)      ‘Aprakat Chetana’: consciousness that is unmanifested as in stones, water, air etc.

This gradation makes us, human beings, realize that we are directly linked to all other beings. Our privileged position as those who possess fully developed consciousness entails certain responsibility of caring and guidance towards the lower grades of creation. Our attitude towards the lower forms of life should not be one of domination and arrogance but that of compassion which permits the rest of creation to co-exist with us. It is nothing but a lesson of respect towards the rest of the created world. The tendency of exploitation of nature would be a serious sin on this account.

 

Cosmocentrism and Inter-connectedness

From all that we said above, we can say that the Hindu tradition is cosmocentric rather than anthropocentric. It puts the cosmos at the very centre of reality. Hence the Hindu traditions are concerned about the welfare of all beings which includes the humans. Hindus thus often express their commitment to wholeness. Hinduism with its sense of the unity and sacredness of all beings can make a unique contribution to ecological justice. The world-view of the Hindu is built on the fundamental metaphor of “wholeness and organic inter-connectedness”. Wholeness connotes that the whole of reality is one (monism: the whole world is the spontaneous unfolding of the supra-sensible First Cause) and ‘organic inter-connectedness’ means that there is interconnection between all the things in the universe and that it is of an organic (internal) nature. The Hindu scriptures, as a whole, invite people to live a just life, loving and nurturing other humans and living beings (Bhagavad Puranas 1:2:13,14).

 

Prayer for Peace

Most of the Vedic rituals end with a prayer for ‘shanti’ or peace (‘Om Shantih!  Shantih!  Shantih!’ – it implies a plea to God that let there be peace on land, upon sea, in the forest and in the space). One can experience true peace only when there is peace all around. Struggle or turmoil in any part of the universe could adversely affect our personal experience of peace.

Here I would like to quote a very ancient prayer from the Hindu tradition which speaks of a spiritual attitude which could facilitate our efforts to bring about social justice.

Sarvetra sukhinah santu

Sarve santu niramayah

Sarve bhadrani pashyantu

Ma kaschit dhukka bhag bhavet.

(= O Lord, let people everywhere be happy; may they be free from all ailments; may all people chance to look upon what is auspicious; let none come to share the sorrows of this life.)

 

The four Debts

In the epic, Mahabharata, we come across the description of four types of debts which an individual incurs during his/ her lifetime. We are indebted to gods, parents, teachers and fellow human beings (Deva rina, Pitri rina, Guru rina and Manushya rina). ‘Rinaiscaturbhih Samyukta jayante manava bhuvi’. One is indebted to the gods and goddesses because they are responsible for the right ordering of the various natural powers and rewarding our efforts in the world. The humans expressed their gratitude in the form of rituals and sacrifices. Again, we are indebted to our parents for the gift of human life. This debt has to be made good by passing on of life or raising up children. Next, an individual is indebted to his/ her teachers which could be repaid by sharing one’s knowledge with the ignorant ones in the society. The fourth debt is towards human-kind. In our day-to-day life we receive so much help from our fellow men and women. We are the beneficiaries of the civilization built up by our ancestors who are no longer with us. Often enough we find ourselves unable to repay those persons who offered their help. But we could repay that debt of gratitude to other members in the society with whom we chance to interact. It is done mostly through compassionate actions to those in need and also refraining from cruelty and violent acts of any kind.

 

The Mode of Greeting Others 

The common gesture of greeting among the Hindus is to fold the hands and bow slightly before the other person. A person would say, ‘Namaste’ while greeting the other and it has a deeper meaning. ‘I bow to the divine within you’. The Hindu scriptures uphold the value of human dignity when it considers the human soul as a spark of the divine fire (light). Constant awareness of this thought would help us to remember the deeper worth of a human person.

 

‘Lokasamgraha’:

Hinduism is one of the most social religions with its concept of ‘lokasamgraha’/ world-order[10]. The learned should act without any attachment to the fruit of their work with a desire to maintain the world-order. The Bhagavad Gita invites the Hindu devotees to perform detached action. This is called ‘Nishkama karma’. Without desiring the selfish advantages from the actions, one must perform all the duties in life with an equanimous  mind. Humans who act for the sake of dharma/ righteousness without attachment to the fruit of the action, can attain the ultimate spiritual fulfillment. Such actions are, in fact, their collaboration with the creator Lord to preserve the universe in its integrity according to God’s plan and will. (Bhagavad Gita 3:20) “Going beyond the Vedic concept of ritual actions, the Bhagavad Gita gives a new dimension to dispassionate human action by adding social responsibilities as an essential element of ‘dharmic’ life”[11].

 

‘Ahimsa’/ Non-violence:

The usual meaning of ‘ahimsa’ is non-killing. In a broader sense this concept is understood as non-injury. Ahimsa is conceived as the opposite of violence of any sort: physical, mental, verbal, religious or moral. Hinduism recommends the practice of ‘ahimsa’ in thought, speech and action. According to it, even thinking ill of others is ‘himsa’/ violence. One should not only commit ‘himsa’ himself/ herself nor permit ‘himsa’ /violence to take place. Nothing permanent can be achieved by violence. Mahatma Gandhi asserts that ‘ahimsa’ is natural to man. When we survey the course of evolution we find that although in the initial stages brute force appeared to be dominant, the progress of evolution is towards ‘ahimsa’/ non-violence. Man’s/ woman’s true nature consists in his/ her spiritual aspect. Humans as spirit is essentially non-violent. The moment the spiritual side is of man/woman is awakened, his/ her non-violent nature becomes apparent. ‘Ahimsa’ is a difficult discipline. It is easy to hate but it requires supreme energy to love especially those who are our opponents. Therefore Mahatma Gandhi says that non-violence is meant for the strong and not for the weak[12]. Violence may have the appearance of strength, but it is born out of fear and is therefore a sign of weakness. The capacity to kill is not a sign of strength, the strength to die is the real strength.

It is true that non-violence requires extreme patience on the part of one who is using this method, but this patience is not a sign of inactivity, it is an expression of a conscious and inner effort to force the so called opponent to see and realize his/her own mistake. This is why it is said that non-violence involves sacrifice and suffering. One presupposition of conscious suffering is that there must be a ‘love’ for even the opponent and also a faith in the essential goodness present in him/her. Thus ‘ahimsa’ is a sure tool to rectify the injustice in the society.

 

‘Sarvodaya’:

‘Sarvodaya’ etymologically means the betterment of all/ progress of all[13]. The end of all activities, social or political, ought to have a single goal: the upliftment of everybody. This can be possible only when no individual is neglected or overlooked. ‘Sarvodaya’ is based on the belief that there is an essential unity behind everything. The forces of disruption that create distinctions between ‘I’ and ‘thou’ are rooted in selfish considerations, whereas the realization of oneness is the supreme condition for the effective following of ethical principles. It is true that a perfect realization of oneness is not possible in this life, but true spiritual life consists not in attaining the ideal, but in constantly striving and aspiring for it.

 

To sum up, I would like to compare the society to a train where all the coaches move together towards its destination. So, too, a society should take all sections of people in its march towards the goal of progress and prosperity. The society should see to it that no group is deprived of their legitimate share in the prosperity of the wider group. This is only possible if the society carefully cultivates a moral pathway. The quintessence of all moral teaching is: Paropakarah punyaya papaya parapidanam. (= Virtue lies in doing good to others and sin consists in doing harm or causing injury to others). To promote justice and peace in the society, one also needs to cultivate a spiritual perspective to life:

Slokardhena pravaksyami yaduktam grantha kotibhih

Brahma satyam jagan mithya jivo bramaiva naparah. (Vedanta School)

(= I shall sum up the teaching of innumerable texts: God is the ultimate truth; the world merits only a relative existence and is passing away into non-being. In the last analysis, all the human souls are identical with that Divinity; never distinct from It). The thought that we all human beings at the deepest level are intimately united to the Divinity without any distinction and that this world has only a relative existence would help us to overcome the illusion of differences and alienation between men and women and live as members of a global family.


[1] cf. M. Hiriyanna , Outlines of Indian Philosophy, First Indian Edition, Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, Delhi 1993, p. 33.           

[2] cf.  Anthony Sudhil, “Establishing Dharma as Process of Liberation”, in Integral Liberation Vol. 9, No. 3, September 2005, p. 172.

[3] cf. Ibid. p. 178.

[4]  cf. T.M.P Mahadevan, Outlines of Hinduism, Third Edition, Chetana, Bombay 1999, p. 66.

[5]  cf. Ibid. p. 72.

[6] Surendranath Dasgupta, A History of Indian Philosophy Vol. IV, First Indian Edition, Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi 1975, p. 9

[7] S. Panneerselvam, “The Philosophy of Liberation: Hindu Perspective”, in Integral Liberation Vol. 9, No.3, September 2005, p. 182

[8]  cf. Ramkrishna Puligandla, Fundamentals of Indian Philosophy, Indian Edition,  DK Printworld, New Delhi 1997, p. 252.

[9] cf. Jadunath Sinha, Indian Philosophy, Vol. I, Second Revised Edition, Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, Delhi 1987, p. 53.

[10]  cf. S.Radhakrishnan, The Bhagavad Gita, Second Edition, Blackie & Son Publishers, Bombay 1979, p. 139.

[11] Anthony Sudhil, “Establishing Dharma as process of liberation”, in Integral Liberation Vol. 9, No. 3, September 2005, p. 178.

[12] cf. Basant Kumar Lal, Contemporary Indian Philosophy, Second Edition,  Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi 1992, p. 111.

[13] cf. Basant Kumar Lal, Contemporary Indian Philosophy, Second Edition,  Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi 1992, p. 150.

 

Bibliography

Chatterjee Satishchandra  and Datta Dhirendramohan, An Introduction to Indian Philosophy, Eighth Reprint Edition, University of Calcutta, Calcutta 1984.

Hiriyanna M., Outlines of Indian Philosophy, First Indian Edition, Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, Delhi 1993.

Mahadevan T.M.P. , Outlines of Hinduism, Third Edition, Chetana, Bombay 1999.

Puligandla Ramkrishna, Fundamentals of Indian Philosophy, Indian Edition,  DK Printworld, New Delhi 1997.

Sinha Jadunath, Indian Philosophy, Vol. I, Second Revised Edition, Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, Delhi 1987.

Lal Basant Kumar, Contemporary Indian Philosophy, Second Edition,  Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi 1992.

Dasgupta Surendranath, A History of Indian Philosophy Vol. IV, First Indian Edition, Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi 1975.

Tachil Jose, An Initiation to Indian Philosophy, Second Edition, Pontifical Institute Publications, Aluva 2001.

Sharma Chandradhar, A Critical Survey of Indian Philosophy, Motilal Banarsidass Publishers, Delhi 1960.

Sharma R.N., Indian Philosophy (Problems& Theories), Surjeet Publications, Delhi 1993.

Radhakrishnan S., Indian Philosophy  Vol. I, Centenary Edition, Oxford University Press, Delhi 1989.

Radhakrishnan S., The Bhagavad Gita, Second Edition, Blackie& Son Publishers, Bombay 1979.

Mahadevan TMP, Invitation to Indian Philosophy, Gulab Vazirani, New Delhi 1974.

Chatterjee Satis Chandra, Classical Indian Philosophies, University of Calcutta, Calcutta 1985.

Margret and Stutley James, A Dictionary of Hinduism, Allied Publishers Private Limited, Bombay 1977.

Eliade Mircea (Editor in Chief), The Encyclopedia of Religion Vol.4, Macmillan Publishing Company, New York 1987.

Sudhil Anthony, “Establishing Dharma as process of liberation”, in Integral Liberation Vol. 9, No. 3, September 2005.

Panneerselvam S., “The Philosophy of Liberation: Hindu Perspective”, in Integral Liberation Vol. 9, No.3, September 2005.