Welcome to Dominicans in India    

  Friars
 
Nuns
 
Sisters
 




 

 

Right to Life

Sr. Philomena Pichappilly cssj

“The care of human life and happiness and not their destruction is the first and only legitimate object of good Governance.” (Thomas Jefferson) Every living being is desirous to live and enjoy the fruits of life.

The belief in the special worth of human life is at the heart of every civilized society. It is this fundamental value which has laid the foundation for all laws. Every human being in the world has a right to be seen as a person before the law. Every one has a right to life and this right is to be protected by law.

Art. 21 of the Indian  constitution guarantees right to life and personal liberty as a fundamental, natural inalienable right, it says “ No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law.” Just one sentence, yet much meaning for practical living, for every Indian citizen is couched into this article, which is ever expanding in its horizon. Right to life includes right to live with human dignity. It would include all those aspects of life which would to make a persons life meaningful. The right to drinking water, pollution free environment, right to food, right to education, right to medical care etc..

Our efforts to bring drinking water, road facility, electricity to the poor areas have met with success. Noise pollution with loud speakers are very common. We were able to curb the noise pollution to a great extent in our village because we have a right to pollution free environment. The loud speaker is a public address system which has to be used only with permission. Even if permission is obtained the volume is not to be too loud to disturb the others. The Noise Pollution [Regulation and control] Rules 2000 section 5 lays down restrictions on the use of loud speaker/public address system. There are many laws to ensure the quality of life and to promote and develop life.

The recently passed act of the protection of women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 aims at protecting the life of women within the family situations. Section 3 of Domestic Violence Act defines domestic violence as under:- “ An act omission or commission on conduct of the respondent, which harms or injuries  or endangers the health safety, life limb or well being weather mental or physical of the aggrieved person …., it includes physical abuse, sexual abuse, verbal and emotional abuse and economic abuse. This new act provides legal recognition to the problem faced by millions of women in our country and will lead to greater awareness of this issue among the judiciary.

The section 4 of the act allows any person to give information about domestic violence to the police officer or magistrate or service providers. This provision is a help, as we know many victims are afraid to complain and claim their due right at home.

There are many other laws for the weaker sections such as dalits, SC, ST, bonded labourers to promote and develop life. Jesus said “I have come that you may have life, life in all its fullness.” Life is not static and Art 21 aims  to develop human personality in its fullness giving opportunities to every one.

IS THERE A RIGHT TO DIE?

Suicide has been a burning issue in our country, daily we hear about farmers committing suicide. Euthanasia is a debatable topic. Death is a concept negative to life and therefore both are each others opposite. Hence the right to life has a special significance.  The right can only imply all those efforts attempts and measures which help sustain support and sustain life. As per Indian Penal Code (IPC) one who abets suicide (Section 306) can be punished with imprisonment for ten years and also liable to pay fine. Section 309 makes attempt to suicide also punishable.

It was argued that under Art. 21 of the Indian constitution right to life also include Right to Die. In Maruthi Shripathi Dubal Vs State of Maharashtra the Bombay High Court opined that the right to life guaranteed by art 21 includes the right to die. It did not explain as to how even at the level of plain logic life included death.

In the year 1994 the case of P. Rathinam came up before the Supreme Court. In this highly controversial judgment justice B.L. Hansaria invalidated section 309 of I.P.C. saying that it is unconstitutional on the ground that it violates the Fundamental Right to life. He further said that it needs to be effaced from the stature book to humanize our penal laws. Section 309 reads as follows, “whoever attempts to commit suicide and does any act towards the commission of such offence shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year or with fine or with both.”  Justice B.L. Hansaria thought that it is a cruel and irrational provision which punishes a person again (doubly) who has suffered agony and would be undergoing ignominy because of his failure to commit suicide.

In 1996 another case came before the Supreme Court, and the controversy was finally resolved in Gian Kaur Vs State of Punjab. In this case the decision of P. Rathinam was overruled. And this decision has been the law of the land till today. It has been stated that Right to Life under article 21 of the Indian constitution does not include Right to die or right to be killed as the very nature of such right is inherently inconsistent with the right to life. The court reiterated it’s view in the context of Euthanasia that the argument to support the views to permitting the termination of life in such cases to a dying person, who is terminally ill and is totally dependant on life support systems by accelerating the process of natural death, when it was imminent and unavoidable, was not available to interpret Article 21 to include the right to curtail the natural span of life.

It would be apt to comment that decriminalization of suicide and Euthanasia is unworkable in the Indian perspective even on humanitarian grounds. The Indian Constitution under article 21 upholds the sanctity of life till the end. The law does not allow any sort of unnatural end to human life. Every person is a crown of beauty in the hand of the Lord, and the state and the laws exist to protect and promote life at any cost.

Top