Welcome to Dominicans in India    

  Friars
 
Nuns
 
Sisters
 




 

 

1st Sunday of Lent

Matt. 4:1-11

Fr. Malachy O'Dwyer, OP

1. On this the first Sunday of Lent we always read one of the accounts of the several weeks Jesus spent in the desert and the temptations, which he experienced there. Matthew, Mark and Luke, each tell the story in their own way. But the story could only have originated with Jesus himself. Only he could have told his disciples and friends of what happened during the forty days which he spent alone, by himself, in the wilderness. Obviously he must have felt that what happened then was important for them to know, that it was significant enough to have shaped the last years of his life
                        We recall that the experience took place immediately after Jesus had presented himself to be baptized by John the Baptist in the river Jordan. And we recall too that that must have been a dramatic moment in the life of Jesus. For the previous thirty years he had led a quiet and hidden life with his parents at Nazareth. Now he decides it is time for him to give himself to the service of God in a public way, much the same as John the Baptist was doing. His being baptized marks the beginning of a new life. From now on he will be living the life of a wandering preacher. The change, the contrast with his life as he had lived it up to now, must have been unsettling to say the least. How can you make such a drastic change without being upset and worried about the implications, the consequences, of what you are about to do? How can you leave a settled, ordered and familiar life for a life where nothing is certain or sure without some inner turmoil and anxious questioning? Surely that must have been what Jesus experienced once he had made the decision to begin what we call his public ministry.
                     2. We can understand easily enough why he felt the need just then to spend some time by himself pondering and reflecting on the implications of his decision, what that decision was going to mean for the years ahead. Saint Matthew says - "He was led by the Spirit into the wilderness ... " And there, alone by himself all the doubts and hesitations about the rightness, the correctness, of his decision began to assail him. It’s a common enough experience for us to appreciate something of what he went through during those days in the desert. It is precisely at the moment of making an important decision, one which is to change the course of our lives, that we are assailed by many doubts as to the correctness of the path we have chosen. It is then, at the moment of choosing, that we are most vulnerable. It is then that all the reasons and arguments against the decision come flooding into our minds, and it is there in the loneliness of one's mind that the matter has to be settled one way or the other. So, what we refer to as the 'temptations' of Jesus are really the account of his struggle to come to grips with what he had decided was to be his vocation in life. It was a time of testing, of trying to see what might be the implications of remaining faithful, steadfast, to the path he had decided he should take.
                     Forty days and forty nights it took him to resolve the matter, to work his way through all the doubts and misgivings which assailed him. That it took so long gives us some idea of the inner turmoil which he must have experienced. It was a long battle between the Spirit and Satan before the matter was settled. And while it was going on, Jesus must have felt that he was being pulled and tugged in both directions, that he was being torn apart in the depths of his being. What we have in the Gospel accounts can only be the bare bones of what happened during that struggle which lasted for so long. But what we find there must be the heart of the matter because that is precisely what Jesus himself told his disciples and friends about his experience.
                     3. And indeed, the very first doubt that came to him struck at the heart of what he felt to be his vocation. It took the form of the question or rather the taunt - "If you are the Son of God". We have no way of knowing what exactly was Jesus' consciousness of his being the "Son of God" at that moment of his life. All we can say is that he must have felt some inclination, some premonition, that he had a very special and singular relationship with God. And we know that something special did happen at his baptism which Saint Matthew has expressed in this way - "As soon as Jesus was baptized, he went up out of the water. At that moment heaven was opened, and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a dove and lighting on him. And a voice from heaven said, 'This is my beloved Son, whom I love; with whom I am well pleased." (3: 15-17). But the things of the Spirit, the things of God, are not quantifiable or measurable and so, in terms of concrete human experience, they always leave room for questioning. That means, while Jesus felt powerfully moved to accept his vocation as the "Son of God", so much so that the rest of his life was to be shaped by that conviction, there was still room for doubts to be sown - "If you are the Son of God.
                     The voice which tempted him seemed to be saying - ' you are not really all that sure, are you! / ' and, supposing it's not true, what then! / would not your whole life be a sham! / and if you are not absolutely sure, why not test yourself - "command these stones to become loaves of bread." / surely that would be proof that you have extraordinary power / it's as easy as that to get rid of any doubts you might have'.
                     That Jesus did have extraordinary powers was to be borne out many times out during the next three years of his ministry - he did heal the sick, he did raise from the dead, he did multiply the loaves and the fish. So, why not change a few stones into loaves of bread if by so doing he could prove to himself that he was truly the "Son of God"? But no, he refuses, and he appeals to something which he remembers from the Scriptures - "It is written, 'Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God',"
                   4. What, then, is the significance, of his refusal to give way to any of the three temptations which came to him. He must have thought - 'if my vocation is as I think it to be, then God will show me to be truly his Son in his own good time. For the present what is being asked of me is to show my solidarity with those to whom I have been sent. And surely that must mean that I too, like them, have to live with the uncertainties, the doubts, the confusions even which are part of human existence'. Joannes Metz puts that well - "Christ .... he professed and accepted our humanity, he took it on and endured our lot, he stepped down from his divinity. He came to us where we really are - with all our broken dreams and lost hopes, with the meaning of existence slipping through our fingers. He came and stood with us, struggling with his whole heart to have us say 'yes' to our innate poverty." (J.B. Metz, Poverty of Spirit, Paulist Press, New York, 1968, p 7)
                This then is the resolve, which Jesus reached at the end of those forty days in the desert wrestling with the implications of the life and ministry he was about to begin. He will not set himself apart from those whom he wishes to serve, he will not distance himself in any way from them and from the limitations of the human condition, its uncertainties and insecurities. There is a continuity here with the stance which he took at his baptism. On that occasion, he took his place with all those who were waiting to be baptized by John the Baptist. He was just one of the crowd, simply standing there with them without saying a word.
                 5. While it is a comfort to us to know that Jesus is one who stands by us in all the uncertainties and insecurities of life, there is another valuable lesson to be drawn from what happened to him during those forty days in the desert. It is the fact that Jesus, under pressure to take a different pathway to achieve what he had set out to do, deliberately refused to use power, prestige or any position of advantage to further what he was convinced was his vocation, which was no less than the redemption of all mankind - as Saint Paul reminds us in today's second reading (Rom. 5; 12-19). Neither can we ever turn to power or to a show of strength to further the cause of Christ. And that might be a temptation in a time when others are using just such means to belittle, if not attack, the cause of Christ here in India.